<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Film Scanners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arransalerno.com/blog/film-scanners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arransalerno.com/blog/film-scanners/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arran</title>
		<link>http://www.arransalerno.com/blog/film-scanners/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Arran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 03:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arransalerno.com/blog/?p=228#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom. A friend of mine has the 4990, and he seems to get nice results from it too. They&#039;re also considerably cheaper than the Epson V500 too.
cheers mate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom. A friend of mine has the 4990, and he seems to get nice results from it too. They&#8217;re also considerably cheaper than the Epson V500 too.<br />
cheers mate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Swanborough-Nilson</title>
		<link>http://www.arransalerno.com/blog/film-scanners/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Swanborough-Nilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arransalerno.com/blog/?p=228#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Hi there,
in my opinion the best you can go for is the Epson 4490/4990. I&#039;ve used one for 135, 120 and 5x4, and the rsults have been excellent. Yes, the quality isn&#039;t good enough for large prints, but that&#039;s what the negs are for.
That&#039;s my $0.02.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,<br />
in my opinion the best you can go for is the Epson 4490/4990. I&#8217;ve used one for 135, 120 and 5&#215;4, and the rsults have been excellent. Yes, the quality isn&#8217;t good enough for large prints, but that&#8217;s what the negs are for.<br />
That&#8217;s my $0.02.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.381 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 15:58:16 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
