<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Film Scanners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arransalerno.com/blog/2008/07/film-scanners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arransalerno.com/blog/2008/07/film-scanners/</link>
	<description>Photography, Cameras, etc...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Arran</title>
		<link>http://www.arransalerno.com/blog/2008/07/film-scanners/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>Arran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 03:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arransalerno.com/blog/?p=228#comment-389</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom. A friend of mine has the 4990, and he seems to get nice results from it too. They're also considerably cheaper than the Epson V500 too. 
cheers mate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom. A friend of mine has the 4990, and he seems to get nice results from it too. They&#8217;re also considerably cheaper than the Epson V500 too.<br />
cheers mate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Swanborough-Nilson</title>
		<link>http://www.arransalerno.com/blog/2008/07/film-scanners/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Swanborough-Nilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arransalerno.com/blog/?p=228#comment-386</guid>
		<description>Hi there,
in my opinion the best you can go for is the Epson 4490/4990. I've used one for 135, 120 and 5x4, and the rsults have been excellent. Yes, the quality isn't good enough for large prints, but that's what the negs are for.
That's my $0.02.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,<br />
in my opinion the best you can go for is the Epson 4490/4990. I&#8217;ve used one for 135, 120 and 5&#215;4, and the rsults have been excellent. Yes, the quality isn&#8217;t good enough for large prints, but that&#8217;s what the negs are for.<br />
That&#8217;s my $0.02.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
